The hacker Emil Külev was permanently detained ᐉ News from Faktibg Crimes ФАКТИБГ
p
Jun 30 2024 2002
219
pp
ppThe court permanently detained the hacker Teodor Iliev representing under the pseudonym Emil Külev For him the prosecution claims that over the years he managed to break through the databases of dozens of government institutions banks insurance companies and other companies According to the prosecution he penetrated the information arrays of institutions and companies copied them and used them to extort money from them Last year the 21yearold man announced that he had also siphoned data from the insurance companys system which was said to be controlled by Alexei PetrovppAccording to the defense of Teodor Iliev there is no direct evidence that the hacker Emil Külev and Teodor Iliev are the same person According to Ilievs lawyer the prescribed punishment for such a crime is not high enough to require custody The hackers defense pointed out that the law enforcement authorities made the connection between the person of Iliev and the hacker Emil Külev based on Internet publications internal feeling and rumorsppFurthermore in the pretrial proceedings documents it was written that an inspection of the internet space was carried out but it was not clear how exactly it was carried out In addition Teodor Iliev has a clean criminal record as this in combination with the lack according to the defense of materials proving that the hacker Emil Külev is Teodor Iliev prove that there is no need for a restraining order Iliev himself claims that he does not understand the accusationpp
ppThe court explained that in the protocol for the search of Todor Ilievs apartment it was written that flash drives a mobile phone and other devices were seized but they were not the property of Iliev but of a woman with whom he is supposed to be living together In addition part of the witnesses are two employees of the GDBOP who saw an object falling from the second floor which turned out to be a laptop A broken portable computer was also found next to a container near the apartment block where Iliev livedppGDBOP employees also saw an open window on the second floor Now it must be established whether this window is of Todor Ilievs residenceppThe court announced that the witnesses are divided into two groups The first group are people who were brought in to establish facts and circumstances surrounding Ilievs personality The other group are persons who claim to have communicated with the hacker Emil Külev and on the basis of such testimony a reasonable assumption is made that the hacker Kyulev is Todor Ilievpp
ppStefan Cholakov is the name of the witness who gave the testimony on the basis of which the prosecution is based Witnesses who worked in the hacked companies and institutions were also questioned who received emails from a hacker with the pseudonym Emil Külev who wanted to transfer funds and assets to him in order to return sensitive information that was stolen from their databases The mistake of the hacker Emil Külev was that he allowed a conversation between him and a witness to be recorded at a time when his voice modulator was not on However the record is without expertiseppThe court considered it important the measure of Todor Iliev to allow him to participate in the pretrial proceedings since the case deals with a very complex legal and technological matter In addition in a short period of time the seizure of Ilievs cryptoassets in the crossborder legal entities that he used to store the cryptocurrency will be requestedppThe alleged real name of the hacker with the pseudonym Emil Külev is Teodor Iliev He has no convictions and was born in 2003 He claims to be unemployed with a secondary education The charges against him cover a period of 4 years which means that at the time of the potential commission of the crimes he was a minorppAfter receiving the ransoms Iliev transferred the funds to other legal entities The information according to the prosecutor was recorded in the Bitcoin blockchain system which proved the path of the money The state prosecution claims that there is a danger that Teodor Iliev will abscond or commit another crime During the court session Teodor Iliev did not seem worried or under emotional affectpp
ppMore news from CrimesppTop 5
read
p
Jun 30 2024 2002
219
pp
ppThe court permanently detained the hacker Teodor Iliev representing under the pseudonym Emil Külev For him the prosecution claims that over the years he managed to break through the databases of dozens of government institutions banks insurance companies and other companies According to the prosecution he penetrated the information arrays of institutions and companies copied them and used them to extort money from them Last year the 21yearold man announced that he had also siphoned data from the insurance companys system which was said to be controlled by Alexei PetrovppAccording to the defense of Teodor Iliev there is no direct evidence that the hacker Emil Külev and Teodor Iliev are the same person According to Ilievs lawyer the prescribed punishment for such a crime is not high enough to require custody The hackers defense pointed out that the law enforcement authorities made the connection between the person of Iliev and the hacker Emil Külev based on Internet publications internal feeling and rumorsppFurthermore in the pretrial proceedings documents it was written that an inspection of the internet space was carried out but it was not clear how exactly it was carried out In addition Teodor Iliev has a clean criminal record as this in combination with the lack according to the defense of materials proving that the hacker Emil Külev is Teodor Iliev prove that there is no need for a restraining order Iliev himself claims that he does not understand the accusationpp
ppThe court explained that in the protocol for the search of Todor Ilievs apartment it was written that flash drives a mobile phone and other devices were seized but they were not the property of Iliev but of a woman with whom he is supposed to be living together In addition part of the witnesses are two employees of the GDBOP who saw an object falling from the second floor which turned out to be a laptop A broken portable computer was also found next to a container near the apartment block where Iliev livedppGDBOP employees also saw an open window on the second floor Now it must be established whether this window is of Todor Ilievs residenceppThe court announced that the witnesses are divided into two groups The first group are people who were brought in to establish facts and circumstances surrounding Ilievs personality The other group are persons who claim to have communicated with the hacker Emil Külev and on the basis of such testimony a reasonable assumption is made that the hacker Kyulev is Todor Ilievpp
ppStefan Cholakov is the name of the witness who gave the testimony on the basis of which the prosecution is based Witnesses who worked in the hacked companies and institutions were also questioned who received emails from a hacker with the pseudonym Emil Külev who wanted to transfer funds and assets to him in order to return sensitive information that was stolen from their databases The mistake of the hacker Emil Külev was that he allowed a conversation between him and a witness to be recorded at a time when his voice modulator was not on However the record is without expertiseppThe court considered it important the measure of Todor Iliev to allow him to participate in the pretrial proceedings since the case deals with a very complex legal and technological matter In addition in a short period of time the seizure of Ilievs cryptoassets in the crossborder legal entities that he used to store the cryptocurrency will be requestedppThe alleged real name of the hacker with the pseudonym Emil Külev is Teodor Iliev He has no convictions and was born in 2003 He claims to be unemployed with a secondary education The charges against him cover a period of 4 years which means that at the time of the potential commission of the crimes he was a minorppAfter receiving the ransoms Iliev transferred the funds to other legal entities The information according to the prosecutor was recorded in the Bitcoin blockchain system which proved the path of the money The state prosecution claims that there is a danger that Teodor Iliev will abscond or commit another crime During the court session Teodor Iliev did not seem worried or under emotional affectpp
ppMore news from CrimesppTop 5
read
p
