Sentiment recovers $870K after negotiations with hacker
Sentiment recovers $870K after negotiations with hacker
The hacker returned 414 Ether in one initial transaction and 51.75 ETH in another, returning 90% of the stolen funds.
8641
Total views
3
Total shares
Listen to article
2:14
Sentiment recovers $870K after negotiations with hackerNEWS
Own this piece of history
Collect this article as an NFT
Lending protocol Sentiment has managed to recover the stolen funds from the recent hack by offering the hacker a bounty worth $95,000.
In an on-chain transaction on the Arbitrum blockchain, Sentiment sent a message to the hacker offering $95,000 if the hacker returned the funds by April 6, urging the hacker to “do the right thing.“ If the hacker did not return the funds, the protocol also offered the money to anyone who could help find and prosecute the culprit.
On-chain message from Sentiment to the hacker. Source: Arbiscan
MetaMask developer Taylor Monahan tracked the progress and highlighted that the hacker had returned 414 Ether
ETH
tickers down
$1,839
, worth around $771,000, in an initial transaction. Eventually, the hacker returned another 51.75 ETH to the Sentiment recovery address. After the transaction, the lending protocol confirmed that they had received the funds.
The hack was performed on April 4. Some on-chain sleuths suggested that the attack may have been a re-entry attack, while others said that the attacker relied on a bug. Initial estimates of the lost funds were around $500,000, but after a while, community members confirmed that the losses were closer to $1 million.
Advertisement
Claim your wallet ID and do crypto on/off-ramp, effortlessly. Ready, set, XGo!
Related: Sandwich trading bots lose bread and butter in $25M exploit
Meanwhile, a community member concluded that the entire fiasco is a result of companies not taking bug bounties seriously and praised the hacker’s efforts for “taking it by force.” On the other hand, another Twitter user described the incident as just “a bug bounty with a criminal step,” and urged companies to offer larger and more transparent bug bounties.
Hackers are redefining bounty programs. Why take smol bounty when big bounty better.
— ru (@ru_defi) April 6, 2023
The incident draws some similarities to the recent Euler Finance hack. On April 4, the Ethereum protocol convinced a hacker to return around 90% of the stolen funds after offering a bounty. The hacker returned around $176.4 million in digital assets while keeping almost $20 million.
The hacker returned 414 Ether in one initial transaction and 51.75 ETH in another, returning 90% of the stolen funds.
8641
Total views
3
Total shares
Listen to article
2:14
Sentiment recovers $870K after negotiations with hackerNEWS
Own this piece of history
Collect this article as an NFT
Lending protocol Sentiment has managed to recover the stolen funds from the recent hack by offering the hacker a bounty worth $95,000.
In an on-chain transaction on the Arbitrum blockchain, Sentiment sent a message to the hacker offering $95,000 if the hacker returned the funds by April 6, urging the hacker to “do the right thing.“ If the hacker did not return the funds, the protocol also offered the money to anyone who could help find and prosecute the culprit.
On-chain message from Sentiment to the hacker. Source: Arbiscan
MetaMask developer Taylor Monahan tracked the progress and highlighted that the hacker had returned 414 Ether
ETH
tickers down
$1,839
, worth around $771,000, in an initial transaction. Eventually, the hacker returned another 51.75 ETH to the Sentiment recovery address. After the transaction, the lending protocol confirmed that they had received the funds.
The hack was performed on April 4. Some on-chain sleuths suggested that the attack may have been a re-entry attack, while others said that the attacker relied on a bug. Initial estimates of the lost funds were around $500,000, but after a while, community members confirmed that the losses were closer to $1 million.
Advertisement
Claim your wallet ID and do crypto on/off-ramp, effortlessly. Ready, set, XGo!
Related: Sandwich trading bots lose bread and butter in $25M exploit
Meanwhile, a community member concluded that the entire fiasco is a result of companies not taking bug bounties seriously and praised the hacker’s efforts for “taking it by force.” On the other hand, another Twitter user described the incident as just “a bug bounty with a criminal step,” and urged companies to offer larger and more transparent bug bounties.
Hackers are redefining bounty programs. Why take smol bounty when big bounty better.
— ru (@ru_defi) April 6, 2023
The incident draws some similarities to the recent Euler Finance hack. On April 4, the Ethereum protocol convinced a hacker to return around 90% of the stolen funds after offering a bounty. The hacker returned around $176.4 million in digital assets while keeping almost $20 million.
